Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711838›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2025

Stepping into the role of a doctor: an instrumental case study to explore the experiences of third-year medical students in a simulated general practice clinic.

Niki Jakeways, Sharon Markless, Russell Hearn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Niki JakewaysKing's Undergraduate Medical Education in the Community (KUMEC), Centre for Education, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-0311-490X
Sharon MarklessCentre for Education, King's College London, London, UK.
Russell HearnKing's Undergraduate Medical Education in the Community (KUMEC), Centre for Education, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6909-7395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation provides an environment in which students can work beyond their competence. Thus even junior medical students can 'step into the role of a doctor'; to explore and gain more insight into their future role. Role-playing as doctor in a simulated environment has shown to be of value for final-year students, but this has not been studied with third-year students, who may struggle to be active participants in the clinical environment. This research used instrumental case study methodology to explore the educational value of third-year students 'stepping into' the doctor-role in a General Practice clinic simulation. Data was gathered via twenty-four interviews with students and tutors, observations and an online student survey. The value of stepping into the role of doctor centered around the experience of responsibility and was associated with feelings of agency; thinking differently with more focus on management and decision-making; insight into, and preparation for, the role of a practitioner, including working with uncertainty. Most students took part in the exercise of adopting the 'doctor' role; student buy-in was dependent upon explicit discussion of the challenge, feelings of authenticity and negotiation of concerns. GP tutors facilitating the clinic played a key role in establishing psychological safety and negotiating student concerns. Stepping into the role of doctor is a valuable exercise for junior medical students as it can provide an authentic experience of clinical responsibility that is not available in the clinical setting; and presents an opportunity to deepen student understanding of the practitioner role.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateGeneral PracticePhysician's RoleStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleRole PlayingGeneral practice simulationjunior medical studentsprofessional identityrole-playuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40711838
PMCPMC12302394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.