Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711806›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Efficacy of the Web-Based Swedish Individualized Active Communication Education (I-ACE) Program in First-Time Hearing Aid Users: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Louise Werther, Elisabet Sundewall Thorén, Jonas Brännström, Gerhard Andersson, Marie Öberg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise WertherDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology in Östergötland and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, University Hospital, Linköping, 58185, Sweden, 46 0724638793.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6917-6425
Elisabet Sundewall ThorénDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-1201
Jonas BrännströmDepartment of Clinical Science, Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-5539
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology in Östergötland and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, University Hospital, Linköping, 58185, Sweden, 46 0724638793.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-6745
Marie ÖbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology in Östergötland and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, University Hospital, Linköping, 58185, Sweden, 46 0724638793.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-1636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is estimated to affect more than 20% of the global population. Hearing aid fitting is a common intervention in audiological rehabilitation; however, there are still those who struggle with remaining communication difficulties that require additional intervention. The group rehabilitation program Active Communication Education (ACE) has been shown to be an effective alternative for addressing these remaining difficulties. To increase accessibility, the ACE program was modified to an individual version. The effects of the Individualized Active Communication Education (I-ACE) are yet to be explored in a randomized controlled trial. Objective: This study aims to explore the effects of the internet-based Swedish I-ACE program on the use of communication strategies, self-perceived hearing difficulties, and the emotional effects of hearing loss, as well as whether these effects persist long-term. Methods: First-time hearing aid users with 6-12 months of experience with hearing aids were invited to participate in a randomized controlled trial. The participants were allocated to either the Swedish I-ACE intervention program or the delayed intervention control group. The 5 chapters of the I-ACE were delivered over a 5-week period through the nationally available online health portal for the public health system, 1177.se. Each week, feedback was provided through the platform by a clinician. The efficacy of the I-ACE was determined by change of the primary outcome of emotional consequences and acceptance of hearing loss, and use of communication strategies. The secondary outcome measures included perceived hearing difficulties, hearing aid efficacy, and intervention efficacy. Participants completed the self-assessed outcome measures at baseline (T0), post intervention (T1), and 6 months post intervention (T2) through the platform. Results: A total of 57 participants (I-ACE, n=29 and delayed intervention control, n=28) were included in the analyses. Compared with the control group, the Swedish I-ACE improved the emotional consequences and acceptance of hearing loss, as well as use of communication strategies (the Communication and Acceptance Scale, F1, 54=7.26, P=.01 and the Communication Strategies Scale, F1, 53=6.35, P=.02). There were no differences in perceived hearing difficulties or hearing aid efficacy between the two groups. All outcomes remained stable at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: The results suggest that the I-ACE program can be an effective alternative for reducing emotional consequences of hearing loss and increasing the use of communication strategies to reduce remaining communication difficulties.

Indexed as

CommunicationHearing AidsHearing LossInternetPatient Education as TopicAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenACEactive communication educationaural rehabilitationcommunication strategieseHealthhearing lossI-ACE

Identifiers

PMID40711806
PMCPMC12292026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.