SynthesisUpdates in surgery2025
Postoperative antibiotic strategies in acute complicated appendicitis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on, "Postoperative antibiotic strategies in acute complicated appendicitis: a systematic review".Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Rethinking postoperative antibiotics in complicated appendicitis: is less enough? Reply to the Commentary on: "Postoperative antibiotic strategies in acute complicated appendicitis: a systematic review".Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on "Postoperative antibiotic strategies in acute complicated appendicitis: a systematic review".Updates in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, with complicated cases carrying an increased risk of infections and morbidity. Whilst preoperative antibiotics help reduce infections, the optimal postoperative regimen remains undefined. Variability exists in antibiotic choice, route and duration. This review aimed to examine recent evidence on postoperative antibiotic stewardship for complicated appendicitis to guide optimal treatment strategies. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO registry. A search on PubMed and Cochrane library databases identified studies on postoperative antibiotic use in appendicectomy. Two independent reviewers screened studies, including RCTs, cohort studies and observational studies. Data extraction covered study characteristics, interventions and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with GRADE used to evaluate evidence certainty. This review included 11 studies with 8361 participants. Shorter intravenous antibiotic courses (2-6 days) were found to be non-inferior to longer regimens in preventing infections and reducing hospital stays. Risk factors for prolonged antibiotic use included disease severity and surgical complexity. In selected patients, oral antibiotics were shown to be equally effective. Shorter intravenous antibiotic courses and early transition to oral antibiotics effectively managed complicated appendicitis, reducing hospital stays and healthcare costs without increasing complications. Individualised treatment decisions based on patient risk factors and intraoperative findings are essential. Tailoring antibiotic regimens to individual patient characteristics remains crucial. These findings support antibiotic stewardship efforts and highlight the need for further research, particularly in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.