ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Role of Ovarian Stem Cells in Postnatal Oogenesis and Implications in Fertility Preservation.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is a long-held dogma in reproductive biology that females are born with a set nonrenewable number of oocytes in the ovary. While some animal studies challenged this dogma by demonstrating allegedly postnatal oogenesis and the presence of certain stem cell factor expression germ cell markers, their biological roles are yet to be defined. In this chapter, we revisited this issue revisit this dogma in light of most recent data. The chapter outlines the characteristics of these putative OSCs, including their morphological features, expression of germline markers (e.g., DDX4, DAZL), telomerase activity, and methods for their isolation and culture, acknowledging the ongoing debate and methodological controversies surrounding their identification, particularly the reliability of DDX4-based sorting. We critically evaluate the evidence for their capacity to differentiate into oocyte-like cells in vitro and in vivo, including experiments involving transplantation into animal models. Finally, the chapter explores the profound implications these OSCs hold for fertility preservation, especially for women facing premature ovarian insufficiency, age-related infertility, or gonadotoxic treatments. We discuss potential future applications, such as autologous OSC transplantation to restore ovarian function or in vitro generation of mature oocytes for fertilization. We highlight the significant technical and safety hurdles that must be overcome, including optimizing culture systems, ensuring genomic stability, and validating human functional competency. While the physiological role and definitive existence of functional OSCs in adult human ovaries remain contentious subjects requiring further rigorous investigation using advanced techniques like single-cell analysis and lineage tracing, the potential therapeutic promise continues to drive research in this exciting, albeit controversial, area of reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40711717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.