ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Do "auditory" and "visual" time really feel the same? Effects of stimulus modality on duration and passage-of-time judgements.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emotional pictures and time: The effects of arousal and valence on the perception of duration and the subjective passage of time.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigated the previous claim that auditory stimuli appear to last longer than visual ones, but that the modality has no influence on the experience of the passage of time (POT). Participants judged the duration, the POT, and the phenomenal quality of the two temporal experiences after hearing a tone or viewing a blue square with a duration between 200 ms and 5 s. The results showed modality effects on both duration and POT judgements, with longer duration and slower POT judgements for auditory than for visual stimuli. Judgements of phenomenal quality showed large interindividual differences, with most participants showing positive but some also negative relationships with target duration for both qualities. Importantly, duration and POT judgements were largely unaffected by these interindividual differences. The present results clearly contradict the previous assumption that the experienced POT is not influenced by sensory modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.