ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Information-theoretic measures for mapping regularities between orthography and phonology: A comprehensive quantification and validation in the Chinese writing system.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information theory has been widely applied to quantify mapping regularities between orthography and phonology in alphabetic writing systems. However, their applicability to the Chinese writing system-marked by distinct mapping characteristics-remains underexplored. This study presents a comprehensive quantification of mapping regularities in the Chinese writing system using information-theoretic measures and validates their effectiveness. We first compute three core measures-entropy, surprisal, and information gain-across multiple dimensions: mapping direction (orthography-to-phonology vs. phonology-to-orthography), frequency type (type vs. token frequency), and grain size (tonal vs. base syllable; direct vs. fundamental phonetic radical), followed by an assessment of overall system uncertainty using entropy. Second, we demonstrate the ability of information-theoretic measures to predict Chinese reading performance using a large-scale Chinese naming dataset. Third, we show that these measures capture unique aspects of character variability in naming performance not accounted for by traditional measures (i.e., regularity and consistency). Finally, by comparing information-theoretic measures across different mapping directions, frequency data types, and grain sizes, we highlight their flexibility in capturing unique aspects of character variability in naming performance. Critically, these findings hold across both a self-compiled database and an external corpus featuring a substantially larger token pool, underscoring the robustness and generalizability of these measures. In sum, we emphasize the effectiveness and adaptability of information-theoretic measures in capturing mapping regularities in a writing system that is notably distinct from alphabetic systems, and we discuss their promising applications for advancing psychological and linguistic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40711675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.