SynthesisEndocrine2025
Using machine learning to predict remission after surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence for predicting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in pituitary surgery: the path to clinical solutions.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Evolution of Radiomic Features in Radiation-Induced Necrosis During Follow-Up of Brain Metastases: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Brain Tumor MRI Reporting and Treatment-Planning Segmentation: A Retrospective Paired Workflow Evaluation.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Recurrence in High-Grade Glioma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating AI chatbots in neurological function test interpretation for brain tumor surgery.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Clinically informed preoperative risk stratification for MRI-defined non gross-total resection in nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center internal validation study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Risk-Stratifying Pituitary Adenoma Treatment: A Cohort Analysis and Risk Prediction of Hypopituitarism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative remission in pituitary adenoma (PA) patients significantly affects treatment outcomes and quality of life. Accurate prediction of remission is crucial for neurosurgeons and oncologists as it aids in personalizing treatment plans, optimizing follow-up care, and preventing unnecessary interventions. Unlike diagnostic classification, this review specifically focuses on remission prediction as a distinct prognostic application of AI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the google scholar was conducted to identify eligible studies until Dec 2024. Data on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted from the included studies.
resultsOut of 1530 studies screened, 10 met our eligibility criteria involving ML approaches in patients with confirmed PA. ML algorithms, particularly artificial neural networks (ANN), offer promising performance for predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. Meta-analysis of 10 studies resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11-0.32), negative DLR of 15.26 (95% CI: 8.23-28.26), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 28.25 (95% CI: 10.85-73.57), the diagnostic score was 3.34 (95% CI: 2.38-4.3) and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93).
conclusionML-based models demonstrate moderate to high diagnostic accuracy in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. While these models show promise in enhancing clinical decision-making post-surgery, further prospective validation and larger studies are necessary before their routine clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40711667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.