Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711667›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2025

Using machine learning to predict remission after surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Behnaz Niroomand, Pooya Eini, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Ali Mortezaei, Mohammad Hassan Bagheri, Ahmet Günkan, Daniel M Aaronson, Vratko Himic and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ibrahim MohammadzadehSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ibrahim.mdz7777@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8862-0778
Bardia HajikarimlooDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Behnaz NiroomandSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5184-7445
Pooya EiniToxicological Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9457-8588
Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7600-6925
Ali MortezaeiStudent Research Committee, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Mohammad Hassan BagheriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-5578-3215
Ahmet GünkanDepartment of Radiology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0131-5699
Daniel M AaronsonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-6639
Vratko HimicDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-5317
Ricardo J KomotarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. rkomotar@med.miami.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative remission in pituitary adenoma (PA) patients significantly affects treatment outcomes and quality of life. Accurate prediction of remission is crucial for neurosurgeons and oncologists as it aids in personalizing treatment plans, optimizing follow-up care, and preventing unnecessary interventions. Unlike diagnostic classification, this review specifically focuses on remission prediction as a distinct prognostic application of AI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the google scholar was conducted to identify eligible studies until Dec 2024. Data on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted from the included studies.

resultsOut of 1530 studies screened, 10 met our eligibility criteria involving ML approaches in patients with confirmed PA. ML algorithms, particularly artificial neural networks (ANN), offer promising performance for predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. Meta-analysis of 10 studies resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11-0.32), negative DLR of 15.26 (95% CI: 8.23-28.26), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 28.25 (95% CI: 10.85-73.57), the diagnostic score was 3.34 (95% CI: 2.38-4.3) and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93).

conclusionML-based models demonstrate moderate to high diagnostic accuracy in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. While these models show promise in enhancing clinical decision-making post-surgery, further prospective validation and larger studies are necessary before their routine clinical integration.

Indexed as

AdenomaMachine LearningPituitary NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisRemission InductionArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningOutcomePituitary adenomaRemission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.