ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
Blood Pressure Management Pre- and Post-Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence and Insights from Recent Studies.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage after Endovascular Thrombectomy Is Associated With Poor Functional Outcomes and Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Hypotension-driven continuous watershed cerebral infarction secondary to critical coronary artery disease: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between Hyperacute Blood Pressure Lowering and Outcomes in Patients With Endovascular Thrombectomy.Journal of stroke · 2026Article
- Micro/Nanorobotic Systems for Imaging-Guided Closed-Loop Thrombus Recanalization.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors Involved in Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEffective control of blood pressure (BP) is potentially a critical determinant in making a successful recovery from acute ischemic stroke. BP is often elevated after the onset of this critical illness, and it is related to both the severity of the ischemic injury and subsequent changes in cerebral perfusion and collateral blood flow. However, recent studies have challenged longstanding assumptions over the safety and efficacy of BP lowering in being able to reduce the risk of reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence and discusses the evolving landscape of BP management in acute ischemic stroke. RECENT
findingsThree prehospital ambulance-initiated trials of early BP lowering in patients with undifferentiated stroke have shown neutral or adverse effects, while the results of multiple trials of in-hospital management BP lowering in patients who have received successful reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion highlight the risks of over-aggressive treatment. Despite considerable research effort, the optimal BP management strategy in acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain, although avoiding excessive reductions appears critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.