ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Random regression models for genetic analysis of milk, fat, and protein yields in the Murciano-Granadina goats with the Legendre polynomials and B-spline functions.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, test-day records of milk yield (TDMY), fat yield (TDFY), and protein yield (TDPY) of first-parity Murciana-Granadina goats, collected from 2017 to 2024 in the southern part of Kerman province of Iran, were used. The traits were analyzed by applying random regression models (RRMs) with the Legendre polynomials (LEG) and B-spline (BSP) functions. The RRM with order 3 for direct genetic and animal permanent environmental effects under the LEG function was the best for TDMY. The RRMs employing quadratic BSP functions with 5 and 4 knots were determined as the most suitable models for TDFY and TDPY, respectively. The heritability [Formula: see text] estimates of TDMY across the lactation period were low, varying from 0.15 ± 0.03 at days in milk (DIM) 5 to 0.03 ± 0.02 at DIM 275. For TDFY, the [Formula: see text] estimates were medium to low and varied from 0.22 ± 0.09 at DIM 5 to 0.01 ± 0.01 at DIM 245. The [Formula: see text] estimates of TDPY were low and ranged from 0.18 ± 0.07 at DIM 5 to 0.02 ± 0.01 at DIM 215. Genetic correlation estimates varied from 0.41 ± 0.18 (DIMs 5 and 203) to 0.99 ± 0.17 (DIMs 137 and 275) for TDMY, 0.41 ± 0.12 (DIMs 5 and 275) to 0.98 ± 0.16 (DIMs 203 and 275) for TDFY, and 0.18 ± 0.06 (DIMs 5 and 203) and also 0.18 ± 0.10 (DIMs 5 and 275) to 0.99 ± 0.17 (DIMs 137 and 203) for TDPY. The strongest genetic correlations were found between closely located DIMs, with these correlations decreasing as the interval between DIMs increased. In general, early DIMs showed higher genetic variations relative to the other stages of the lactation period with positive genetic correlations in late lactation. Therefore, there is an opportunity for early selection practices to improve the traits in the later stages of the lactation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40711615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.