ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Implementation of pneumatic retinopexy in the Japanese population.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scleral Penetration by a Cryoprobe in Primary Buckling Surgery for Traumatic Retinal Detachment: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo propose an implementation model for pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in a region where PnR is performed infrequently, and to assess its impact on treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). STUDY
designRetrospective case series.
methodsWe reviewed 222 consecutive eyes with primary RRD treated from July 2017 to September 2023 at a tertiary care center in Japan. The treatment methods utilized included pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB) and PnR. The surgeon learned PnR through social media. Primary anatomic reattachment rate (PARR) and visual acuity outcomes were compared between the pre-PnR (prior to the implementation; 110 eyes) and post-PnR (after the implementation; 112 eyes) periods, as well as between PnR and PPV in the post-PnR period. PARR for PnR was also evaluated based on RRD characteristics and gas injection frequency.
resultsIn the post-PnR period PnR was performed in 53.6% (60/112)of cases. The PARR was similar in the pre-PnR (97.3%) and post-PnR (93.8%) periods (P=.33). Visual outcomes were similar both across periods and between PnR and PPV at 3, 6 and 12 month post-operatively. The PARR for PnR was 88.3% overall, 90.5% in eyes meeting the Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria, 93.3% in eyes with a single break and 100% in eyes with a single break meeting PIVOT criteria. Eyes with a single gas injection had higher PARR than eyes requiring an additional gas injection (93.5% vs. 71.4%).
conclusionRemote-learning utilizing social media effectively enabled PnR implementation with favorable anatomic and functional outcomes in a real-world setting in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.