Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711452›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025

Emerging probiotics: future therapeutics for human gut health.

Sylvia H Duncan, Carlos Sabater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mGem:mBio · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sylvia H DuncanRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4903-0978
Carlos SabaterRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6098-895X

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Z001064/1Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division RI-B6-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial communities that colonize the human large intestine can influence many aspects of health and Bacillota strains, in particular, have been proposed as next-generation probiotics. Of note are strains including fibre-degraders, butyrate producers, lactate producers and utilizers, and other beneficial metabolic activities that are important for health. To illustrate the potential applications of colonic bacteria to design novel prebiotic formulations, a comparative genomics analysis of 16 bacterial strains isolated from the human gut was performed. This analysis revealed a high number of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in the genome sequences of understudied Lachnospiraceae and Oscillospiraceae members including Roseburia intestinalis L1-82, Roseburia faecis M72/1, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens 16-4, and Ruminococcus bicirculans 80/3, ranging from 32 to 56 CAZymes across different strains. These strains showed complementary enzymatic profiles covering a wide range of different activities required to degrade prebiotic substrates derived from vegetable sources such as arabino- and xylo-oligosaccharides and pectic-oligosaccharides. These metabolic differences highlight the potential of these strains to cross feed and to allow the design novel probiotic consortia for microbiota-oriented interventions that could target specific disease conditions. These bacterial strains are, however, strict anaerobes and therefore special measures may need to be put in place to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractProbioticsGenome, BacterialHumansPrebioticsPrebioticsEubacteriumFaecalibacteriumnext-generation probioticsRoseburiaRuminococcus

Identifiers

PMID40711452
PMCPMC12342623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.