ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Veterinary Prescriptions of Antibiotics Approved for Human Use: A Five-Year Analysis of Companion Animal Use and Regulatory Gaps in Brazil.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern, influenced by antibiotic use in both human and veterinary medicine, especially in companion animals. In low- and middle-income countries, regulatory oversight on veterinary prescriptions is often limited, creating gaps that can accelerate AMR. This study aimed to characterize the use of antibiotics approved for human use that are prescribed by veterinarians for companion animals in Brazil, a country representative of broader regulatory challenges. We conducted a retrospective analysis of five years (2017-2021) of national sales data recorded by the National System for the Management of Controlled Products (SNGPC), maintained by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA). A total of 789,893 veterinary antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed over the five-year period, providing a comprehensive overview of prescribing patterns. The dataset included all oral and injectable antibiotics purchased in human pharmacies with veterinary prescriptions. Data wrangling and cleaning procedures were applied to extract information on volume, antibiotic classes, seasonal variation, and regional distribution. The results revealed a predominance of penicillins, first- and second-generation cephalosporins, and a marked increase in macrolide use, especially azithromycin. Notable regional disparities were observed, with the southeastern region leading in prescription volume. The findings, particularly the disproportionate use of azithromycin and the marked regional disparities, highlight the need for targeted monitoring policies and a stricter regulation of off-label antibiotic use in veterinary medicine. They also offer insights applicable to other countries facing similar AMR threats due to limited surveillance and regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.