ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Validation of Wireless Harness for Measuring Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate, and Body Temperature in Hospitalized Dogs.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic Tracking of Respiratory Rate and Quantitative Analysis of Heat Stress Response of Caged Broilers Based on Infrared Thermal Imaging Video Amplification Technology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of vital signs could improve patient care in veterinary hospitals by identifying changes earlier and reducing patient stress from repeated handling. This study aimed to assess the agreement between a wireless harness device and manual measurement of heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature in hospitalized dogs. Nineteen client-owned dogs wore the harness throughout hospitalization and paired manual and harness measurements were collected every 4-8 h. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement. The device demonstrated strong correlation with manual measurements for heart rate and respiratory rate; however, the limits of agreement (LoA) exceeded predefined clinical thresholds, indicating high variability in individual readings. Temperature measurements showed a mean difference of 1.34 °F (manual minus harness), indicating underestimation by the harness. The LoA for temperature also exceeded predefined clinical thresholds, particularly in dogs with long fur. Fur length significantly influenced respiratory rate and temperature measurements, but not heart rate. Chest conformation also impacted respiratory rate and temperature accuracy. Heart rate was the most consistent parameter across all body types. Overall, the device tracked trends in heart rate and respiratory rate, supporting its potential as a supplemental monitoring tool. However, measurements should be confirmed manually prior to clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.