Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711278›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Comparison of Digital Rectal Thermometry and a Non-Contact Veterinary Infrared Thermometer in Cats: Identifying Alternative Sites to Rectal Measurement.

Carlotta Tombolani, Daniela Alberghina, Mauro Gioè, Fausto Quintavalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlotta TombolaniIndipendet Veterinary Practitioner, 37100 Verona, Italy.
Daniela AlberghinaDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Via Palatucci 13, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2826-0325
Mauro GioèIndependent Researcher, Altofonte, 90072 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8889-6232
Fausto QuintavallaDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-1167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal temperature measurement in cats, while crucial, can cause discomfort and stress. This study evaluated non-contact infrared thermometry as a less invasive alternative.

methodsA total of 95 cats were enrolled in this study. The cats were categorized into three age groups: Group I (n = 20 kittens, 2-6 months), Group II (n = 34 young cats, 7-24 months), and Group III (n = 41 adult cats, >24 months).

resultsThe mean rectal temperature in cats was approximately 38 °C, which was significantly higher than both ocular temperature (

conclusionsNon-contact infrared thermometry offers advantages for feline temperature monitoring. Perineal infrared temperatures appear to be a useful, non-invasive alternative to rectal measurements in cats.

Indexed as

body temperaturecateyeperineal regionthermometer

Identifiers

PMID40711278
PMCPMC12298758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.