ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Effect of Pooling and Freeze-Thaw Processes on the PRRSV RNA Detection in TOSc Samples.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tonsil oral scrubbing (TOSc) is a simple and practical method recently developed for detecting PRRSV RNA in sows. This study evaluated how pooling and freeze-thaw procedures affect PRRSV RT-rtPCR results in TOSc samples. To assess pooling effects, 22 PRRSV-positive samples were divided into three Ct categories and diluted with negative TOSc samples at various ratios before testing. To assess freeze-thaw effects, 90 TOSc samples were split into two equal aliquots: one tested immediately, and the other tested after one freeze-thaw cycle. Results showed that PRRSV RNA detection probability decreased and Ct values increased as dilution (pooling) ratios rose. Samples with Ct values > 35 had significant drops in probability of detection beginning at a 1:3 dilution (≤71%). In contrast, samples with Ct values <35 maintained a high probability of detection until 1:10 dilution (≥85%). The freeze-thawed samples showed significantly higher Ct values and numerically lower probability of detection compared to non-freeze-thawed ones. In conclusion, pooling and freeze-thaw negatively impact PRRSV RNA detection in TOSc samples. Pooling may be acceptable for samples with a Ct value < 35 for up to 1:10 dilution, but should be avoided when the Ct value > 35. Similarly, the freeze-thaw process should be minimized during TOSc sample handling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.