ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Is 'Green' Gold and Silver Nanoparticle Synthesis Environmentally Friendly?
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Obtained by 'Green' Synthesis Biocompatible?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biosynthesis, characterization, and antiproliferative activity of gold nanoparticles synthesized using Artemisia chamaemelifolia extract against cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- From Bacterial Extract to Breakthrough Therapy:Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Microbial-Based Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Review of Bacteria- and Fungi-Mediated Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials for Water Disinfection: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Environmental Safety.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In scientific literature biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles and synthesis of these nanoparticles using small organic molecules such as citrate have been called: 'green'. It has also been often stated that 'green' synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticle is environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly. The characterization environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly is commonly comparative. The comparison is between 'green' and 'chemical' synthesis. The few available comparative life cycle assessments addressing the environmental impacts of 'green synthesis' of Ag and Au nanoparticles, if compared with 'chemical' synthesis, strongly suggest that a 'green' synthesis should not be equated with being environment(ally) friendly or ecofriendly. The term 'green' for Au and Ag nanoparticles obtained by 'green' synthesis is a misnomer. There is a case for only using the terms ecofriendly or environment(ally) friendly for nanoparticle synthesis when there is a firm basis for such characterization in comprehensive comparative cradle-to-nanoparticle life cycle assessment, taking into account the uncertainties of outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.