ReviewToxins2025
Intramuscular Botulinum Toxin for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Published Cases.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Botulinum Toxin Type A Reduces Pain and NF-κB Levels in a Rat Model of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the 1980s, numerous case reports have explored the use of intramuscular botulinum toxin (BoNT) for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), with significant variation in rationale, dosing, guidance techniques, and outcome measures. This narrative review aims to summarize published evidence on the use of intramuscular BoNT in patients with CRPS, including studies using earlier terminology such as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). Given the heterogeneous and largely anecdotal nature of the literature, this review is intended to map the existing landscape rather than conduct a formal analysis.
methodsThe PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched in August 2024 using terms related to CRPS and botulinum toxin. Following abstract and full-text screening, 25 publications were included.
resultsThe included studies span single case reports, case series, and small cohorts, encompassing at least 96 individual CRPS patients treated with intramuscular BoNT. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous, and key treatment parameters-such as toxin type, target muscles, guidance technique, and dosing-were inconsistently reported.
conclusionThe evidence for intramuscular BoNT in CRPS remains limited and heterogeneous, preventing firm conclusions on its efficacy or safety. Its use may be considered in select cases, particularly those with disabling or painful focal dystonia or myofascial pain, but standardized prospective studies are needed to clarify its clinical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.