ArticleToxins2025
Economic Evaluation of the InTENSE Program of Therapy Alongside Botulinum Neurotoxin a for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Upper Limb Spasticity.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spasticity is a persistent and debilitating consequence of stroke and effective rehabilitation is a healthcare priority. Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) with supportive therapy has increasingly been embedded within clinical practice for treatment of post-stroke spasticity. But the evidence for this approach has hitherto been limited to the findings of a limited number of small trials. The InTENSE trial was undertaken specifically to provide high-quality clinical trial evidence focusing on the effect of BoNT-A and adjunctive therapy on upper limb spasticity. While the clinical trial did not detect a significant impact upon clinical outcomes, there remains a need to evaluate any impact on the broader use of healthcare resources and overall cost-effectiveness. A detailed cost-utility analysis of the InTENSE trial was undertaken. The costs over the 12-month follow-up period were compared with quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained using utilities generated from the EQ-5D three level (EQ-5D-3L) instrument. There were no significant differences in QALY gained between the intervention and control groups identified, or in the majority of health and community care costs. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio per QALY gained was estimated at AU $63,947.11 (Australian dollars), which is well above accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in Australia. The study was unable to identify evidence for the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches combining BoNT-A with adjunctive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.