Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711152›Full record

ArticleToxins2025

Economic Evaluation of the InTENSE Program of Therapy Alongside Botulinum Neurotoxin a for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Upper Limb Spasticity.

Rachel Milte, Jia Song, Sean Docking, Julie Ratcliffe, Ian D Cameron, Maria Crotty, Louise Ada, Coralie English, Natasha A Lannin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel MilteCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Jia SongCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4796-3456
Sean DockingSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7051-7548
Julie RatcliffeCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Ian D CameronSydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0147-047X
Maria CrottyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Louise AdaSydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1369-5721
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-7927
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 304, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-8345

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1079542National Heart Foundation of Australia 106762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is a persistent and debilitating consequence of stroke and effective rehabilitation is a healthcare priority. Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) with supportive therapy has increasingly been embedded within clinical practice for treatment of post-stroke spasticity. But the evidence for this approach has hitherto been limited to the findings of a limited number of small trials. The InTENSE trial was undertaken specifically to provide high-quality clinical trial evidence focusing on the effect of BoNT-A and adjunctive therapy on upper limb spasticity. While the clinical trial did not detect a significant impact upon clinical outcomes, there remains a need to evaluate any impact on the broader use of healthcare resources and overall cost-effectiveness. A detailed cost-utility analysis of the InTENSE trial was undertaken. The costs over the 12-month follow-up period were compared with quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained using utilities generated from the EQ-5D three level (EQ-5D-3L) instrument. There were no significant differences in QALY gained between the intervention and control groups identified, or in the majority of health and community care costs. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio per QALY gained was estimated at AU $63,947.11 (Australian dollars), which is well above accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in Australia. The study was unable to identify evidence for the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches combining BoNT-A with adjunctive therapy.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityAgedChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsStrokeTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsbotulinum neurotoxin Acost-effectiveness analysiscostscost–utility analysiseconomic evaluationrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID40711152
PMCPMC12298870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.