ArticleToxins2025
Validation of a Methodology for the Quantification of DON in Feces and Feedstuffs by UPLC as Possible Strategy to Evaluate the Detoxifying Efficacy of a Mycotoxin Adsorbent In Vivo.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to provide a possible strategy to evaluate the detoxifying efficacy of mycotoxin adsorbents in vivo by analyzing deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration in feces. Fifteen pigs were randomly assigned to five groups (groups A-E, 3 replicates/group). The pigs in each group were fed twice a day for 10 d with 500 g of designed diets (group A, commercial feedstuffs; group B, DON-contaminated (mildewed) feedstuffs; groups C, D, E, mildewed feedstuffs containing 0.2% adsorbent 1, 2, and 3, respectively). For each pig, 2-g fecal samples were collected pre-feeding and analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Nondetectable or low concentrations of DON (<1.38 μg/g) were found in fecal samples from groups A and B. High concentrations of DON (>20 μg/g) were detected in six out of twenty fecal batches from pigs in group C. Moderate concentrations of DON (5.54-6.50 μg/g) were detected in one out of twenty fecal batches from pigs in group D and two out of twenty in group E. Based on the predefined evaluation criteria, higher DON concentration and frequency in feces indicate better adsorbent efficacy. Notably, Absorbent 1 demonstrated a more pronounced detoxification efficacy in vivo compared to the other two absorbents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.