ArticleToxics2025
Comparison of Heavy Metal Pollution, Health Risk, and Sources Between Surface and Deep Layers for an Agricultural Region Within the Pearl River Delta: Implications for Soil Environmental Research.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the past decades, agricultural soil heavy metal pollution has been becoming increasingly severe due to urbanization and industrialization. However, the impact of externally input heavy metals on deep soils remains unclear because most previous relevant research only focused on surface soils. In the present study, Concentrations of eight heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cr, Cd, As, and Hg) were determined for 72 pairs of surface and deep soil samples collected from an agricultural region close to the Pearl River estuary. Subsequently, heavy metal pollution and potential health risks were assessed using the Geo-accumulation Index and Potential Ecological Risk Index, a dose response model and Monte Carlo simulation, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model were combined to analyze heavy metal sources. The results indicated that average concentrations of all heavy metals exceeded their corresponding background values. Cd was identified as the main pollutant due to its extremely high values of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.