Peer-Assisted Learning for First-Year Nursing Student Success and Retention: Findings from a Regional Australian Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Synergising flipped classroom and case-based learning in resource-intensive anatomy education in China: a quasi-experimental study.BMJ open · 2025
   Trial
2. Using Peer-Assisted Learning to Enhance Clinical Reasoning Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Study in Iraq.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025
   Article
3. Effectiveness of Task-Trainer Simulation Versus Peer Education on Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical education and curricular development
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as