ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Micro-Ultrasound in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison with Multiparametric MRI.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Micro-ultrasonography- vs MRI-targeted biopsy in prostate cancer: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Standalone 29-MHz micro-ultrasound for classifying clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of prospective studies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer screening: bridging the gap between acoustic resolution and clinical certainty.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Structured micro-ultrasonography training improves prostate cancer detection and management decisions.BJU international · 2026Article
- Incremental diagnostic value of MRI PI-RADS classification combined with PSA density for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Micro-ultrasound versus mpMRI for targeted prostate biopsy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical integration.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMultiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is widely established as the standard imaging modality for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), yet it can be limited by cost, accessibility, and the need for specialized radiologist interpretation. Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) has recently emerged as a more accessible alternative imaging modality. This review evaluates whether the evidence base for micro-US meets thresholds comparable to those that led to MRI's guideline adoption, synthesizes diagnostic performance data compared to mpMRI, and outlines future research priorities to define its clinical role.
methodsA targeted literature review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between 2014 and May 2025 evaluating micro-US in csPCa detection. Search terms included "micro-ultrasound," "ExactVu," "PRI-MUS," and related terminology. Study relevance was assessed independently by the authors. Extracted data included csPCa detection rates, modality concordance, and diagnostic accuracy, and were synthesized and, rarely, restructured to facilitate study comparisons.
resultsMicro-US consistently demonstrated non-inferiority to mpMRI for csPCa detection across retrospective studies, prospective cohorts, and meta-analyses. Several studies reported discordant csPCa lesions detected by only one modality, highlighting potential complementarity. The recently published OPTIMUM randomized controlled trial offers the strongest individual-trial evidence to date in support of micro-US non-inferiority.
conclusionsMicro-US shows potential as an alternative or adjunct to mpMRI for csPCa detection. However, additional robust multicenter studies are needed to achieve the evidentiary strength that led mpMRI to distinguish itself in clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.