ReviewReports (MDPI)2025
From Pain Control to Early Mobility: The Evolution of Regional Anesthesia in Geriatric Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Review in Reports (MDPI), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined iPACK and adductor canal block versus two-level erector spinae plane block in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Trial
- iPACK block with adductor canal block vs. lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of popliteal plexus block for opioid sparing and pain management after lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Motor-Sparing Regional Analgesia in Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: From Anatomy to Clinical Decision-Making-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Inflammatory Biomarkers Following Orthopedic Surgery: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for hip surgery: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of regional anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has significantly impacted perioperative management, particularly in older adults, where age-related physiological vulnerability requires optimized strategies. Adequate pain control is crucial in enhancing recovery, minimizing opioid consumption, and reducing complications. Traditional nerve blocks such as lumbar plexus and femoral nerve blocks have long been the mainstay of analgesia. However, they are associated with significant motor impairments, which delay mobilization and increase the fall risks. Introducing motor-sparing regional anesthesia techniques represents a substantial advancement in optimizing postoperative pain management while preserving muscle function. Motor-sparing techniques, including the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SI-FIB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB), have been developed to provide adequate analgesia without compromising motor control. The PENG block selectively targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves, ensuring superior pain relief while minimizing quadriceps weakness. Similarly, the SI-FIB provides extensive sensory blockade with minimal motor involvement, allowing for earlier ambulation. The ESPB and QLB extend analgesia beyond the hip region while preserving motor function, reducing opioid consumption, and facilitating early rehabilitation. Compared to traditional motor-impairing blocks, these newer techniques align with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols by promoting early mobility and reducing the hospital length of stay. Studies suggest that motor-sparing blocks lead to improved functional recovery, lower postoperative pain scores, and decreased opioid requirements, which are critical factors in geriatric THA patients. Moreover, these techniques present a safer alternative, reducing the risk of postoperative falls-a significant concern in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement. Despite their advantages, motor-sparing nerve blocks are still evolving, and further research is necessary to standardize the protocols, optimize the dosing strategies, and evaluate the long-term functional benefits. Integrating these techniques into routine perioperative care may significantly enhance patient outcomes and revolutionize pain management in geriatric THA. As regional anesthesia advances, motor-sparing techniques will improve postoperative recovery, ensuring patient safety and functional independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.