Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710805›Full record

ReviewJournal of Intelligence2025

Intelligence and Moral Development: A Critical Historical Review and Future Directions.

Frank Fair, Daniel Fasko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank FairDepartment of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA.
Daniel FaskoSchool of Educational Foundations Leadership and Policy, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0066-7256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is a critical, historical review of the literature on intelligence and moral development. In this review we come to a number of conclusions. For example, we identify methodological issues in past research on intelligence in relation to moral development, from Wiggam's paper in 1941 through the first quarter of the 21st century, and we commend research done with methodological improvements we specify. Also, we conclude that Heyes' evolutionary psychology that humans have a specifiable "starter kit" of processes that produce "cognitive gadgets," including those used in normative thinking, should be given further attention. But, importantly, we note that these "gadgets" may be "malware" or be missing. Another conclusion is that Gert's account of harms and benefits, of the moral rules, of how the rules are justified, and of how violations are justified, can be a fruitful component of the study of moral development. Furthermore, we argue that the work on wisdom by Sternberg, Kristjansson, and others is important to grasp for its relevance to putting morality into action. Lastly, we discuss areas for future research, especially in neuroscience, and we recommend paying attention to practices for the building of practical wisdom and morality.

Indexed as

intelligencemoral developmentneurosciencephronesispsychology

Identifiers

PMID40710805
PMCPMC12294983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.