Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710691›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Morphologic Pattern Differences in Reconstructive Tissue Repair of Bone Defects Mediated by Bioactive Ceramics and Hydrogels: A Microscopic Follow-Up Evaluation of Re-Ossification.

Róbert Boda, Viktória Hegedűs, Sándor Manó, Andrea Keczánné-Üveges, Balázs Dezső, Csaba Hegedűs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Róbert BodaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2169-019X
Viktória HegedűsDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Sándor ManóDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-2685
Andrea Keczánné-ÜvegesDepartment of Biomaterials and Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-8164
Balázs DezsőDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Csaba HegedűsDepartment of Biomaterials and Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-2507

Funding

Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary TKP2021-EGA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although publications have documented the osteo-inductive effects of various bioactive materials on tissue sections, the associated morphologic patterns of tissue remodeling pathways at the cellular level have not been detailed. Therefore, we present a comparative histopathological follow-up evaluation of bone defect repair mediated by silica aerogels and methacrylate hydrogels over a 6-month period, which is the widely accepted time course for complete resolution. Time-dependent microscopic analysis was conducted using the "critical size model". In untreated rat calvaria bone defects (control), re-ossification exclusively started at the lateral regions from the edges of the remaining bone. At the 6th month, only a few new bones were formed, which were independent of the lateral ossification. The overall ossification resulted in a 57% osseous encroachment of the defect. In contrast, aerogels (AE), hydrogels (H), and their β-tricalcium-phosphate (βTCP)-containing counterparts, which were used to fill the bone defects, characteristically induced rapid early ossification starting from the 1st month. This was accompanied by fibrous granulomatous inflammation with multinucleated giant macrophages, which persisted in decreasing intensity throughout the observational time. In addition to lateral ossification, multiple and intense intralesional osseous foci developed as early as the 1st month, and grew progressively thereafter, reflecting the osteo-inductive effects of all compounds. However, both βTCP-containing bone substituents generated larger amounts and more mature new bones inside the defects. Nevertheless, only 72.8-76.9% of the bone defects treated with AE and H and 80.5-82.9% of those treated with βTCP-containing counterparts were re-ossified by the 6th month. Remarkably, by this time, some intra-osseous hydrogels were found, and traces of silica from AE were still detectable, indicating these as the causative agents for the persistent osseous-fibrous granulomatous inflammation. When silica or methacrylate-based bone substituents are used, chronic ossifying fibrous granulomatous inflammation develops. Although 100% re-ossification takes more than 6 months, by this time, the degree of osteo-fibrous solidification provides functionally well-suited bone repair.

Indexed as

bio-ceramicsgranulomatous inflammationosteo-inductiontissue remodelingβTCP-aerogelβTCP-hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID40710691
PMCPMC12294943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.