Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710688›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Biopolymers for Liver Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review.

John Ong, Jacky Junzhe Zhao, Carla Swift, Athina E Markaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John OngCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5103-7311
Jacky Junzhe ZhaoDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3224-9105
Carla SwiftBedfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Bedford Hospital, Bedford MK42 9DJ, UK.
Athina E MarkakiDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-1256

Funding

W D Armstrong Trust, University of Cambridge 2017-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell-derived liver cells, organoids, and lab-grown liver tissue are promising regenerative therapies for liver disease. However, current culture conditions are sub-optimal, producing end-target cells and tissue phenotypes that are immature or unstable when compared to primary liver cells and tissue. Biopolymers used in culture substrates and scaffolds for tissue engineering significantly impact the quality of the end-target cells and tissue, influencing the efficacy of regenerative treatments. In addition, the biochemical properties of some biopolymers may preclude the translation of downstream bioengineered products into clinical practice. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the recent advances in biopolymers within liver tissue engineering, providing an overview of the current usage in the field and highlighting novel substrates that have strong potential to be translated into clinical therapy.

Indexed as

biopolymerscholangiocyteshepatocyteshepatologyhydrogelsorganoidsregenerative medicinescaffoldsstem cellssubstratestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40710688
PMCPMC12294766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.