ArticleJournal of imaging2025
MST-AI: Skin Color Estimation in Skin Cancer Datasets.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing RGB Color Reliability via Simultaneous Comparison with Hyperspectral Data on PantoneJournal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The absence of skin color information in skin cancer datasets poses a significant challenge for accurate diagnosis using artificial intelligence models, particularly for non-white populations. In this paper, based on the Monk Skin Tone (MST) scale, which is less biased than the Fitzpatrick scale, we propose MST-AI, a novel method for detecting skin color in images of large datasets, such as the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive. The approach includes automatic frame, lesion removal, and lesion segmentation using convolutional neural networks, and modeling normal skin tones with a Variational Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model (VB-GMM). The distribution of skin color predictions was compared with MST scale probability distribution functions (PDFs) using the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD) metric. Validation against manual annotations and comparison with K-means clustering of image and skin mean RGBs demonstrated the superior performance of the MST-AI, with Kendall's Tau, Spearman's Rho, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDGC) of 0.68, 0.69, and 1.00, respectively. This research lays the groundwork for developing unbiased AI models for early skin cancer diagnosis by addressing skin color imbalances in large datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.