ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Development of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Thoracic Ultrasound Image Interpretation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enhanced POCUS in Emergency Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence models for point-of-care ultrasound diagnostics in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Adaptation of convolutional neural networks for real-time abdominal ultrasound interpretation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thoracic injuries account for a high percentage of combat casualty mortalities, with 80% of preventable deaths resulting from abdominal or thoracic hemorrhage. An effective method for detecting and triaging thoracic injuries is point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), as it is a cheap and portable noninvasive imaging method. POCUS image interpretation of pneumothorax (PTX) or hemothorax (HTX) injuries requires a skilled radiologist, which will likely not be available in austere situations where injury detection and triage are most critical. With the recent growth in artificial intelligence (AI) for healthcare, the hypothesis for this study is that deep learning (DL) models for classifying images as showing HTX or PTX injury, or being negative for injury can be developed for lowering the skill threshold for POCUS diagnostics on the future battlefield. Three-class deep learning classification AI models were developed using a motion-mode ultrasound dataset captured in animal study experiments from more than 25 swine subjects. Cluster analysis was used to define the "population" based on brightness, contrast, and kurtosis properties. A MobileNetV3 DL model architecture was tuned across a variety of hyperparameters, with the results ultimately being evaluated using images captured in real-time. Different hyperparameter configurations were blind-tested, resulting in models trained on filtered data having a real-time accuracy from 89 to 96%, as opposed to 78-95% when trained without filtering and optimization. The best model achieved a blind accuracy of 85% when inferencing on data collected in real-time, surpassing previous YOLOv8 models by 17%. AI models can be developed that are suitable for high performance in real-time for thoracic injury determination and are suitable for potentially addressing challenges with responding to emergency casualty situations and reducing the skill threshold for using and interpreting POCUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.