ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Exploring Bioimage Synthesis and Detection via Generative Adversarial Networks: A Multi-Faceted Case Study.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenerative Adversarial Networks (GANs), thanks to their great versatility, have a plethora of applications in biomedical imaging with the goal of simulating complex pathological conditions and creating clinical data used for training advanced machine learning models. The ability to generate high-quality synthetic clinical data not only addresses issues related to the scarcity of annotated bioimages but also supports the continuous improvement of diagnostic tools.
methodWe propose a two-step method aimed to detect whether a bioimage can be considered fake or real. The first step is related to bioimage generation using a Deep Convolutional GAN, while the second step involves the training and testing of a set of machine learning models aimed to distinguish between real and generated bioimages.
resultsWe evaluate our approach by exploiting six different datasets. We observe notable results, demonstrating the ability of Deep Convolutional GAN to generate realistic synthetic images for some specific bioimages. However, for other bioimages, the accuracy does not align with the expected trend, indicating challenges in generating images that closely resemble real ones.
conclusionsThis study highlights both the potential and limitations of GAN in generating realistic bioimages. Future work will focus on improving generation quality and detection accuracy across different datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.