ArticleJournal of imaging2025
The Robust Vessel Segmentation and Centerline Extraction: One-Stage Deep Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Fixing Vessel Segmentation Breakage: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Automated computed tomography quantification of iliofemoral venous arc length demonstrates left-sided predominance and sex-specific variation.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- VMamba-QAG-net: a five-stage pipeline for SYNTAX score computation and decision support in interventional cardiology using X-ray angiography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate segmentation of blood vessels and centerline extraction are critical in vascular imaging applications, ranging from preoperative planning to hemodynamic modeling. This study introduces a novel one-stage method for simultaneous vessel segmentation and centerline extraction using a multitask neural network. We designed a hybrid architecture that integrates convolutional and graph layers, along with a task-specific loss function, to effectively capture the topological relationships between segmentation and centerline extraction, leveraging their complementary features. The proposed end-to-end framework directly predicts the centerline as a polyline with real-valued coordinates, thereby eliminating the need for post-processing steps commonly required by previous methods that infer centerlines either implicitly or without ensuring point connectivity. We evaluated our approach on a combined dataset of 142 computed tomography angiography images of the thoracic and abdominal regions from LIDC-IDRI and AMOS datasets. The results demonstrate that our method achieves superior centerline extraction performance (Surface Dice with threshold of 3 mm: 97.65%±2.07%) compared to state-of-the-art techniques, and attains the highest subvoxel resolution (Surface Dice with threshold of 1 mm: 72.52%±8.96%). In addition, we conducted a robustness analysis to evaluate the model stability under small rigid and deformable transformations of the input data, and benchmarked its robustness against the widely used VMTK toolkit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.