ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Optimizing Tumor Detection in Brain MRI with One-Class SVM and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Feature Extraction.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A compact and interpretable multi-source framework for heterogeneous medical image classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PINN-FFD: physics- and frequency-informed one-stage detector for brain tumor detection in MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Robust Industrial Surface Defect Detection Using Statistical Feature Extraction and Capsule Network Architectures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early detection of brain tumors is critical for improving clinical outcomes and patient survival. However, medical imaging datasets frequently exhibit class imbalance, posing significant challenges for traditional classification algorithms that rely on balanced data distributions. To address this issue, this study employs a One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM) trained exclusively on features extracted from healthy brain MRI images, using both deep learning architectures-such as DenseNet121, VGG16, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, and ResNet50-and classical feature extraction techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that combining Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based feature extraction with OCSVM significantly improves anomaly detection performance compared with simpler handcrafted approaches. DenseNet121 achieved an accuracy of 94.83%, a precision of 99.23%, and a sensitivity of 89.97%, while VGG16 reached an accuracy of 95.33%, a precision of 98.87%, and a sensitivity of 91.32%. MobileNetV2 showed a competitive trade-off between accuracy (92.83%) and computational efficiency, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. Additionally, the pure CNN model-trained directly for classification without OCSVM-outperformed hybrid methods with an accuracy of 97.83%, highlighting the effectiveness of deep convolutional networks in directly learning discriminative features from MRI data. This approach enables reliable detection of brain tumor anomalies without requiring labeled pathological data, offering a promising solution for clinical contexts where abnormal samples are scarce. Future research will focus on reducing inference time, expanding and diversifying training datasets, and incorporating explainability tools to support clinical integration and trust in AI-based diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.