ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Biocompatibility of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Cement MTA Flow
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcium silicate liner versus no liner in selective caries removal: a one-year randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Biological and Mechanical Comparison of Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Hydroxide, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Determinants of Definitive Full Pulpotomy Adoption in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Multivariable Analysis of Dental Trainee Decision-Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Powder-to-Liquid Ratio on pH, Calcium Ion Release, and Solubility Behaviors of Endodontic Bioceramics: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimhydraulic calcium silicate-based cements (HCSCs) are widely used in endodontics for vital pulp therapy and other clinical procedures due to their favorable physicochemical and biological properties. This study evaluates the biological properties of two HCSCs-MTA Flow™ and MTA Flow™ White (in a 3:2 liquid-to-powder ratio, thick consistency)-on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). METHODOLOGY: hDPSCs were exposed to leachates from MTA Flow™, MTA Flow™ White, and ProRoot
resultsMTA Flow™ White and ProRoot
conclusionsMTA Flow™ and MTA Flow™ White, used in 3:2 thick consistency, demonstrated biocompatibility comparable to ProRoot
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.