ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2025
Clinician Experiences at the Frontier of Pharmacogenomics and Future Directions.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacogenomics of Antineoplastic Therapy in Children: Genetic Determinants of Toxicity and Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Integrating CRISPR functional genomics with admixture-aware psychotropic pharmacogenetics in Brazil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Genotyping of DPYD and UGT1A1 in Brazilian oncological patients: applying pharmacogenomics in an admixed population.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Opportunities to improve open All of Us data to convey CYP2D6 pharmacological relevance and interpretation overall and according to ancestry.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has emerged as a powerful tool to personalize drug selection and dosing based on a patient's genetic profile. However, there are a range of challenges that impede uptake in current clinical practice. For example, clinicians often express frustration with commercially available PGx panel tests, which fail to consistently include all key actionable PGx genes (according to the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) PGx guidelines, or The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guidelines) and instead are too long with clinically unimportant information (unvalidated genotypes). Additionally, the lack of EMR integration, clinician education and awareness of the benefits of PGx impedes uptake. This paper examines key challenges identified in clinical practice and proposes future directions, focusing on limiting PGx reports to essential data, providing point-of-prescription alerts, and establishing reimbursement pathways that encourage adoption. Future directions include leveraging large language models, integrating point-of-prescription alerts and phenoconversion calculators into the electronic medical record, increasing the genomic diversity of PGx study populations, and streamlining coverage by payers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.