ArticleCells2025
Assessment of Feasibility of the M2 Macrophage-Based Adoptive Gene Transfer Strategy for Osteoarthritis with a Mouse Model.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current osteoarthritis (OA) therapies fail to yield long-term clinical benefits, due in part to the lack of a mechanism for the targeted and confined delivery of therapeutics to OA joints. This study evaluates if M2 macrophages are effective cell vehicles for the targeted and confined delivery of therapeutic genes to OA joints. CT bioluminescence in vivo cell tracing and fluorescent microscopy reveal that intraarticularly injected M2 macrophages were recruited to and retained at inflamed synovia. The feasibility of an M2 macrophage-based adoptive gene transfer strategy for OA was assessed using IL-1Ra as the therapeutic gene in a mouse tibial plateau injury model. Mouse M2 macrophages were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing IL-1Ra or GFP. The transduced macrophages were intraarticularly injected into injured joints at 7 days post-injury and OA progression was monitored with plasma COMP and histology at 4 weeks. The IL-1Ra-expressing M2 macrophage treatment reduced plasma COMP, increased the area and width of the articular cartilage layer, decreased synovium thickness, and reduced the OARSI OA score without affecting the osteophyte maturity and meniscus scores when compared to the GFP-expressing M2 macrophage-treated or PBS-treated controls. When the treatment was given at 5 weeks post-injury, at which time OA should have developed, the IL-1Ra-M2 macrophage treatment also reduced plasma COMP, had a greater articular cartilage area and width, decreased synovial thickness, and reduced the OARSI OA score without an effect on the meniscus and osteophyte maturity scores at 8 weeks post-injury. In conclusion, the IL-1Ra-M2 macrophage treatment, given before or after OA was developed, delayed OA progression, indicating that the M2 macrophage-based adoptive gene transfer strategy for OA is tenable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.