ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research Progress and Challenges in 3D Printing of Bioceramics and Bioceramic Matrix Composites.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Toxicological Evaluation of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite (3DPHA) for Bone Grafting Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing techniques can prepare complex bioceramic parts and scaffolds with high precision and accuracy, low cost, and customized geometry, which greatly broadens their application of 3D-printed bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites in the clinical field. Nevertheless, the inadequate mechanical properties of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds, such as compressive strength, wear resistance, flexural strength, fracture toughness, and other properties, are a bottleneck problem and severely limit their application, which are overcome by introducing reinforcements. Three-dimensional printing techniques and the mechanical property of bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites with different reinforcements, as well as their potential applications for bone tissue engineering, are discussed. In addition, the biological performance of 3D-printed bioceramics and scaffolds and their applications are presented. To address the challenges of insufficient mechanical strength and mismatched biological performance in bioceramic scaffolds, we summarize current solutions, including the advantages and strengthening effects of fiber, particle, whisker, and ion doping. The effectiveness of these methods is analyzed. Finally, the limitations and challenges in 3D printing of bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites are discussed to encourage future research in this field. Our work offers a helpful guide to research and medical applications, especially application in the tissue engineering fields of bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.