ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design of Adaptive LQR Control Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimization for Prosthetic Hand.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer-Tuned LQR Attitude Control of a Three-DOF Hover System.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assistive technologies, particularly multi-fingered robotic hands (MFRHs), are critical for enhancing the quality of life for individuals with upper-limb disabilities. However, achieving precise and stable control of such systems remains a significant challenge. This study proposes an Improved Grey Wolf Optimization (IGWO)-tuned Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) to enhance the control performance of an MFRH. The MFRH was modeled using Denavit-Hartenberg kinematics and Euler-Lagrange dynamics, with micro-DC motors selected based on computed torque requirements. The LQR controller, optimized via IGWO to systematically determine weighting matrices, was benchmarked against PID and PID-PSO controllers under diverse input scenarios. For step input, the IGWO-LQR achieved a settling time of 0.018 s with zero overshoot for Joint 1, outperforming PID (settling time: 0.0721 s; overshoot: 6.58%) and PID-PSO (settling time: 0.042 s; overshoot: 2.1%). Similar improvements were observed across all joints, with Joint 3 recording an IAE of 0.001334 for IGWO-LQR versus 0.004695 for PID. Evaluations under square-wave, sine, and sigmoid inputs further validated the controller's robustness, with IGWO-LQR consistently delivering minimal tracking errors and rapid stabilization. These results demonstrate that the IGWO-LQR framework significantly enhances precision and dynamic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.