Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710233›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Novel Improved Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm for Collaborative 3D Path Planning of UAVs.

Xiaojun Zheng, Rundong Liu, Siyang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaojun ZhengSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-6256
Rundong LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China.
Siyang LiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFB3312204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we propose a novel improved Dung Beetle Optimizer called Environment-aware Chaotic Force-field Dung Beetle Optimizer (ECFDBO). To address DBO's existing tendency toward premature convergence and insufficient precision in high-dimensional, complex search spaces, ECFDBO integrates three key improvements: a chaotic perturbation-based nonlinear contraction strategy, an intelligent boundary-handling mechanism, and a dynamic attraction-repulsion force-field mutation. These improvements reinforce both the algorithm's global exploration capability and its local exploitation accuracy. We conducted 30 independent runs of ECFDBO on the CEC2017 benchmark suite. Compared with seven classical and novel metaheuristic algorithms, ECFDBO achieved statistically significant improvements in multiple performance metrics. Moreover, by varying problem dimensionality, we demonstrated its robust global optimization capability for increasingly challenging tasks. We further conducted the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests to assess the significance of performance differences of the algorithms and to establish an overall ranking. Finally, ECFDBO was applied to a 3D path planning simulation in UAVs for safe path planning in complex environments. Against both the Dung Beetle Optimizer and a multi-strategy DBO (GODBO) algorithm, ECFDBO met the global optimality requirements for cooperative UAV planning and showed strong potential for high-dimensional global optimization applications.

Indexed as

CEC2017cooperative UAVsdung beetle optimizerimprovement strategiespath planning

Identifiers

PMID40710233
PMCPMC12292718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.