Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710216›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Pemigatinib in the Real-World Management of Cholangiocarcinoma Through a Canadian Patient Support Program.

Philip Q Ding, Vincent C Tam, Ravi Ramjeesingh, Jamil Asselah, Brandon S Sheffield, Taylor Mitchell, Anne-Julie Gaudreau, Jennifer J Knox, Winson Y Cheung

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philip Q DingOncology Outcomes Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-5485
Vincent C TamDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 5G2, Canada.
Ravi RamjeesinghDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5584-3505
Jamil AsselahDivision of Medical Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Brandon S SheffieldDivision of Advanced Diagnostics, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON L6R 3J7, Canada.
Taylor MitchellIncyte Biosciences Canada, Pointe-Claire, QC H9R 0A5, Canada.
Anne-Julie GaudreauIncyte Biosciences Canada, Pointe-Claire, QC H9R 0A5, Canada.
Jennifer J KnoxDepartment of Medical Oncology, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Winson Y CheungOncology Outcomes Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn September 2021, pemigatinib received Health Canada approval for previously treated locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with

methodsWe evaluated a multi-centre case series of Canadian patients who were prescribed pemigatinib between September 2021 and January 2023 for eligible CCA diagnoses and enrolled in the PSP. The retrospective study data included demographic and disease-, treatment-, and outcome-related information, and these were collected using a survey of prescribing physicians.

resultsOf the 26 patients who initiated pemigatinib in the PSP, we received survey responses for 18 (69%). Their median age was 57 years, 67% were female, 61% had stage IV disease, and 83% had intrahepatic CCA. Prior to pemigatinib, a partial hepatectomy was performed in 44% of the patients, and 66% of the patients received 2-4 prior lines of systemic therapy. All patients were treated with platinum-based regimens as the first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic disease. The median follow-up time on pemigatinib was 12.6 (range: 2.3-28.4) months, and their median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 12.1 months (95% CI 7.2-NR). The physician-assessed objective response and disease control rates were 56% and 89%, respectively. For the nine patients who discontinued pemigatinib, the median treatment duration was 10.6 months (range: 0.8-21.7). Disease progression was the most common reason for discontinuation (89%). None discontinued due to adverse events.

conclusionsObjective response rates, disease control rates, and a PFS comparable to that in the phase 2 FIGHT-202 trial was reported with pemigatinib use in this Canadian PSP cohort.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaMorpholinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsMorpholinespemigatinibPyrimidinesPyrrolescholangiocarcinomapemigatinibreal worldresponsesurvivalsystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID40710216
PMCPMC12293483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.