Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710187›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Approach.

Matteo De Pastena, Gabriella Lionetto, Salvatore Paiella, Martina Maruccio, Federico Faustini, Elisa Venturini, Antonio Pea, Fabio Casciani, Giuseppe Malleo, Alessandro Esposito

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matteo De PastenaPancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-4357
Gabriella LionettoUniversity of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4635-3680
Salvatore PaiellaUniversity of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-8618
Martina MaruccioPancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Federico FaustiniPancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-5172-2819
Elisa VenturiniUniversity of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Antonio PeaUniversity of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Fabio CascianiPancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe MalleoUniversity of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Alessandro EspositoPancreatic Surgery Unit, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0079-2311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compares the surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive robotic (RLP) and laparoscopic (LLP) left pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.

methodsData from patients who underwent minimally invasive left pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed. Two groups were identified: RLP and LLP. Perioperative outcomes were compared, including operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, and postoperative complications. Oncological outcomes included margin status, lymph node retrieval, lymph node status, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsFifty-four patients were divided into the LLP (

conclusionRLP provides outcomes identical to LLP in treating body-tail pancreatic cancer, with further studies needed to confirm its long-term oncological efficacy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTreatment Outcomedistal pancreatectomyductal adenocarcinomalaparoscopic distal pancreatectomyprognosisrobotic distal pancreatectomysurvival

Identifiers

PMID40710187
PMCPMC12293756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.