Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710105›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

The Burgeoning Importance of Nanomotion Sensors in Microbiology and Biology.

Marco Girasole, Giovanni Longo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco GirasoleIstituto di Struttura della Materia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISM-CNR, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6146-2979
Giovanni LongoIstituto di Struttura della Materia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISM-CNR, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-2155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomotion sensors have emerged as a pivotal technology in microbiology and biology, leveraging advances in nanotechnology, microelectronics, and optics to provide a highly sensitive, label-free detection of biological activity and interactions. These sensors were first limited to nanomechanical oscillators like atomic force microscopy cantilevers, but now they are expanding into new, more intriguing setups. The idea is to convert the inherent nanoscale movements of living organisms-a direct manifestation of their metabolic activity-into measurable signals. This review highlights the evolution and diverse applications of nanomotion sensing. Key methodologies include Atomic Force Microscopy-based sensors, optical nanomotion detection, graphene drum sensors, and optical fiber-based sensors, each offering unique advantages in sensitivity, cost, and applicability. The analysis of complex nanomotion data is increasingly supported by advanced modeling and the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning, enhancing pattern recognition and automation. The versatility and real-time, label-free nature of nanomotion sensing position it as a transformative tool that could revolutionize diagnostics, therapeutics, and fundamental biological research.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMicrobiologyNanotechnologyGraphiteMicroscopy, Atomic ForceGraphiteantibiotic susceptibilitybacterial resistancebiological specimens: atomic force microscopynanomechanical sensorsnanomotion sensor

Identifiers

PMID40710105
PMCPMC12293152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.