ArticleBiosensors2025
Enhancing Biomarker Detection and Imaging Performance of Smartphone Fluorescence Microscopy Devices.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence microscopy enabled by smartphone-coupled 3D instruments has shown utility in different biomedical applications ranging from diagnostics to biomanufacturing. Recently, we have designed and developed these devices and have demonstrated their utility in micro-nano particle sensing and leukocyte imaging. Here, we present a novel application for enhancing the imaging performance of smartphone fluorescence microscopes (SFM) and reducing their operational complexity. Computational noise correction is employed using 3D Averaging and 3D Gaussian filters of different kernel sizes (3 × 3 × 3, 7 × 7 × 7, 11 × 11 × 11, 15 × 15 × 15, and 21 × 21 × 21) and various standard deviations σ (for Gaussian only). Fluorescent beads of different sizes (8.3, 2, 1, 0.8 µm) were imaged using a custom-designed SFM. The application of the computational filters significantly enhanced the signal quality of particle detection in the captured fluorescent images. Amongst the Averaging filters, a kernel size of 21 × 21 × 21 produced the best results for all bead sizes, and similarly, amongst Gaussian filters, σ equal to 5 and a kernel size equal to 21 × 21 × 21 produced the best results. This visual improvement was then quantified by calculating the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of filtered and unfiltered original images using a custom-developed quality assessment algorithm (AQAFI). Lastly, noise correction using Averaging and Gaussian filters with the previously identified optimal parameters was applied to images of fluorescently tagged human peripheral blood leukocytes captured using an SFM under various conditions. The ubiquitous nature and simplistic application of these filters enable their utility with a range of existing fluorescence microscope designs, thus allowing us to enhance their imaging capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.