Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709962›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the VIA-72 Strengths Inventory.

Francisco Varela-Figueroa, María García-Jiménez, Rosario Antequera-Jurado, Francisco Javier Cano-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisco Varela-FigueroaDepartamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Camilo José Cela, 41018 Sevilla, Spain.
María García-JiménezDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Camilo José Cela, 41018 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4751-061X
Rosario Antequera-JuradoDepartamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Camilo José Cela, 41018 Sevilla, Spain.
Francisco Javier Cano-GarcíaDepartamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Camilo José Cela, 41018 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-2455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Values in Action Inventory (VIA) is one of the most widely used measures for assessing character strengths. While the original version includes 240 items, shorter versions such as the VIA-72 have been developed to enhance its applicability. Psychometric studies of the VIA-72 in Spanish are still limited. This study examined the factorial structure, reliability, and convergent validity of the Spanish VIA-72 in a sample of 470 adults. Three alternative models-comprising three, five, and six factors-were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. All models showed acceptable fit, but the three-factor solution-Caring, Self-Control, and Inquisitiveness-showed the best performance in terms of parsimony, fit indices, and conceptual clarity. Internal consistency for the three-factor model was high across dimensions and comparable to previous studies. Convergent validity was supported through meaningful correlations with personality traits, particularly with conscientiousness. The factorial structure largely replicated findings obtained with both VIA-72 and VIA-240. These results support the Spanish VIA-72 as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing character strengths, offering a concise, theory-based alternative for Spanish-speaking populations.

Indexed as

character strengthsconfirmatory factor analysisfactor structurepersonality traitspositive psychologypsychometric validationSpanish adaptationVIA-72

Identifiers

PMID40709962
PMCPMC12294608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.