Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709856›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025

MyotonPRO Is Not Comparable to Shear Wave Elastography in the Measurement of Rectus Femoris Muscle Stiffness due to Interference of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue.

Cameron D Ley, Eduardo Martinez Valdes, Conall F Murtagh, Jonathan Power, Lee Nobes, Barry Drust

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cameron D LeySchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0238-216X
Eduardo Martinez ValdesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-7514
Conall F MurtaghSports Science Department, Liverpool Football Club and Athletics Ground Ltd, Liverpool, UK.
Jonathan PowerMedical Department, Liverpool Football Club, Liverpool, UK.
Lee NobesMedical Department, Liverpool Football Club, Liverpool, UK.
Barry DrustSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue biomechanical properties are important for optimizing musculoskeletal performance and reducing injury risk. The MyotonPRO was developed as a simple, portable, noninvasive, and highly reliable method for the estimation of muscle stiffness. It has not, however, been comprehensively validated against shear wave elastography (SWE), a validated ultrasound-based method for assessing tissue stiffness. To assess this, 20 participants completed two visits in which rectus femoris (RF) stiffness was measured twice with the MyotonPRO device and SWE at three distinct muscle regions (proximal, medial, and distal), three muscle lengths (relaxed-REL, neutral-NEU, and passively stretched-PAST), and four depths (skin-SKIN, fascia-FAS, superficial muscle-SUP, and deep muscle-DEEP). Additionally, subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness (SAT) was recorded at each location under every condition using B-mode ultrasound imaging. When pooling the regions in REL, the MyotonPRO exhibited a weak significant negative correlation with SWE in DEEP (r = -0.27, p = 0.020), but not at SKIN, FAS, or SUP. In NEU and PAST, stiffness estimated by the MyotonPRO had a moderate positive relationship with SWE in the SKIN (r = 0.66, p < 0.001; r = 0.60, p < 0.001), but weaker relationships with deeper tissue (FAS, r = 0.26, p = 0.023; r = 0.20, p = 0.069; SUP, r = 0.24, p = 0.036; r = 0.26, p = 0.023; DEEP, r = 0.315, p = 0.008; r = 0.454, p < 0.001, respectively). Stiffness measured by the MyotonPRO exhibited significant moderate-to-strong negative correlations with SAT in every region under every condition, except for medially in REL. These results suggest that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably to estimate the stiffness of the RF muscle.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesQuadriceps MuscleSubcutaneous FatAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleUltrasonographyYoung AdultBiomechanicsMuscleMyotonPROShear wave elastographyStiffness

Identifiers

PMID40709856
PMCPMC12291615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.