ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025
MyotonPRO Is Not Comparable to Shear Wave Elastography in the Measurement of Rectus Femoris Muscle Stiffness due to Interference of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Shear Wave Elastography-Derived Muscle Stiffness and Muscle Force/Activation in Foot and Ankle Muscles: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Influence of Menopause on Mechanical Properties of Pelvic Floor and Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Intra- and inter-session reliability of the MyotonPro in measuring the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the knee extensor and flexor muscles.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Regional Differences in Muscle and Fascial Tissue Stiffness in the Rectus Femoris Are Dependent Upon Localised Stretching.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy modulates hamstring stiffness and flexibility in young males with hamstring tightness: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Acute Effects of Nordic Hamstring Exercise on Hamstring Stiffness: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- MyotonPRO Is Not Comparable to Shear Wave Elastography in the Measurement of Rectus Femoris Muscle Stiffness due to Interference of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue biomechanical properties are important for optimizing musculoskeletal performance and reducing injury risk. The MyotonPRO was developed as a simple, portable, noninvasive, and highly reliable method for the estimation of muscle stiffness. It has not, however, been comprehensively validated against shear wave elastography (SWE), a validated ultrasound-based method for assessing tissue stiffness. To assess this, 20 participants completed two visits in which rectus femoris (RF) stiffness was measured twice with the MyotonPRO device and SWE at three distinct muscle regions (proximal, medial, and distal), three muscle lengths (relaxed-REL, neutral-NEU, and passively stretched-PAST), and four depths (skin-SKIN, fascia-FAS, superficial muscle-SUP, and deep muscle-DEEP). Additionally, subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness (SAT) was recorded at each location under every condition using B-mode ultrasound imaging. When pooling the regions in REL, the MyotonPRO exhibited a weak significant negative correlation with SWE in DEEP (r = -0.27, p = 0.020), but not at SKIN, FAS, or SUP. In NEU and PAST, stiffness estimated by the MyotonPRO had a moderate positive relationship with SWE in the SKIN (r = 0.66, p < 0.001; r = 0.60, p < 0.001), but weaker relationships with deeper tissue (FAS, r = 0.26, p = 0.023; r = 0.20, p = 0.069; SUP, r = 0.24, p = 0.036; r = 0.26, p = 0.023; DEEP, r = 0.315, p = 0.008; r = 0.454, p < 0.001, respectively). Stiffness measured by the MyotonPRO exhibited significant moderate-to-strong negative correlations with SAT in every region under every condition, except for medially in REL. These results suggest that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably to estimate the stiffness of the RF muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.