ReviewPhysiological reports2025
Rigorous methodological approaches to address knowledge gaps in exercise, nutrition, immunity, and infection risk research.
Review in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of acute bovine colostrum supplementation on immune responses to prolonged cycling: a randomised crossover trial.European journal of nutrition · 2026Trial
- Forging resilient warriors within: exercise's epic role in training innate immunity and taming inflammation's storm.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rigorous methodological approaches to address knowledge gaps in exercise, nutrition, immunity, and infection risk research.Physiological reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and the associated symptoms can have significant impacts for the general population and athletes (e.g., affecting training, recovery, and performance). Various factors influence the risk of URTI, including physiological stress (i.e., exercise), psychological stress, sleep, travel, nutrition, and pathogen exposure. Traditional research in exercise immunology has relied heavily on ex vivo immune markers, which lack clinical relevance and overlook immune redundancy and robustness. As such, it is unsurprising that interventions affecting these markers do not always align with URTI risk. More recently, evidence has emphasized the importance of in vivo immune markers and clinical outcomes to assess infection risk, and the role of interventions to mitigate this. Traditionally, nutritional exercise immunology research has focused only on mechanisms affecting URTI via immune modulation. However, nutritional interventions may also act via immune-independent mechanisms (e.g., direct antipathogenic mechanisms). For future research, we recommend prioritizing clinically relevant endpoints (validated URTI logs; pathogen screening); using in vivo markers representing the integrated immune response; large sample size; and implementing stringent study controls. Experimental infection challenge models offer controlled investigations of interventions. These approaches will enhance our ability to determine the impact of exercise and nutrition on immunity and URTI outcomes in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.