ArticleChinese medical journal2026
Development and validation of deep learning for predicting the growth of ovarian cancer organoids.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoid Intelligent Morphomics: Decoding the organoid morphome through artificial intelligence from phenotypic quantification to mechanistic insight.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Organoid intelligence: a promising paradigm for autism spectrum disorder research.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Organoids and AI-integrated models in ovarian cancer research: the future of personalized therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrganoids have attracted enormous interest in disease modeling, drug screening, and precision medicine. However, developing robust patient-derived organoids (PDOs) was time-consuming, costly, and had low success rates for certain cancer types, which limited their clinical utility. This study aimed to develop an interpretable deep learning-based model to predict the cultivation outcome of ovarian cancer organoids in advance.
methodsLongitudinal microscopy images of 517 ovarian cancer organoid droplets were divided into training ( n = 325), validation ( n = 88), and test ( n = 104) sets. Subsequently, growth prediction models were developed based on four neural network backbones (ResNet18, VGG11, ConvNeXt v2, and Swin Transformer v2), and specific optimization methods were designed for better prediction. Finally, 179 samples from multiple centers were collected for prospective validation, and the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) method was used for interpretability analysis of the deep model to reveal the basis of the model's decisions.
resultsThe test set showed that the deep learning models could achieve high-performance prediction at the third stage with area under the curve (AUC) values greater than 0.8 for all four models. The homogeneous transfer learning optimization method improved the AUC from 0.833 to 0.884 ( P = 0.0039). In prospective validation, the optimized model achieved an AUC of 0.832, a Brier score of 0.1919 in the calibration curve, and a greater net benefit in the decision curve. Interpretability analysis revealed that the area where organoids are being formed and have already formed is important for prediction.
conclusionsOur developed models achieved satisfactory results in predicting the growth of ovarian cancer organoids. There is potential for further development of the model toward process automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.