Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Aurore Thomazeau *Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-2867
Sabine Rannio *Centre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-3680
Jennifer A BrockCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Hovy Ho-Wai WongCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3317-478X
Per Jesper SjöströmCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-2223
Funding
Canada Foundation for Innovation 28331CIHR 156223CIHR 191969CIHR 191997CIHR 295104Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 254033Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 259572Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 317516Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 10.3030/892837McGill University HBHLMcGill University IPN recruitment awardMcGill University Max Stern recruitment awardNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2017-04730Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2017-507818Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2024-06712QBIN 35450
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In the textbook view, NMDA receptors (NMDARs) act as coincidence detectors in Hebbian plasticity by fluxing Ca
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Neocortical layer-5 tLTD relies on non-ionotropic presynaptic NMDA receptor signaling. · full record | OpenQuestion