Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40709752›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Variation in sexual signals and defensive strategies elicits receiver-dependent shifts in attractiveness.

Brian C Leavell, Dineilys Aparicio, Hoover Pantoja-Sánchez, Rachel A Page, Ximena E Bernal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian C LeavellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-9309
Dineilys AparicioSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Panamá.ORCID 0009-0001-1609-852X
Hoover Pantoja-SánchezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-0471
Rachel A PageSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Panamá.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-0669
Ximena E BernalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6155-5980

Funding

Animal Behavior SocietyNational Science FoundationNational Science Foundation DGE-1842166National Science Foundation IOS-1433990Purdue UniversitySmithsonian Tropical Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection often favors the evolution of conspicuous mating displays. Emitting such overt displays carries the risk of interception by eavesdropping enemies, i.e. predators, parasitoids and parasites that exploit communication systems to find and attack their signaling victims. Yet, many signalers respond to variation in perceived eavesdropper risk, protecting themselves through risk-dependent inducible defenses to mitigate potential costs. Given that signalers are embedded in communication networks in which they interact with other signalers, target receivers and multiple eavesdropping enemies, here we investigated how variation in signaling and defensive strategies impacted by an eavesdropping enemy (frog-biting midges; Diptera: Corethrellidae) affects other receivers in a communication network. Ultimately, we aimed to determine whether and to what extent effects that cascade throughout the network shape relative fitness among chorusing males. Using female choice experiments with túngara frogs (Engystomops pustulosus) and predation experiments with eavesdropping, fringe-lipped bats (Trachops cirrhosus), we show that variation in the call elaboration and defensive strategies of competing males shapes their relative fitness. Defensive strategies targeting eavesdropping frog-biting midges indirectly shift a male's relative attractiveness to females and predatory bats, though the mechanisms and impacts are context and receiver specific. These findings showcase how the frequency-dependent effects of micropredation can dynamically shape variation in secondary sexual characteristics and thus influence the mechanisms driving sexual selection.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnuraChiropteraDipteraMating Preference, AnimalSexual Behavior, AnimalSexual SelectionAnimalsFemaleMalePredatory BehaviorEavesdropperEngystomops pustulosusFemale choiceForagingInducible defensePredator–prey interactionsVibratory cues

Identifiers

PMID40709752
PMCPMC12319409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.