ArticleJournal of biophotonics2025
Deep Learning for Autonomous Surgical Guidance Using 3-Dimensional Images From Forward-Viewing Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Journal of biophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning fusion of multi-channel imaging from polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) was developed for the analysis of volumetric optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to enhance endoscopic guidance during percutaneous nephrostomy. The model was performance-benchmarked using a 10-fold nested cross-validation procedure and achieved an average test accuracy of 90.57% across a dataset of 10 porcine kidneys. This performance significantly exceeded that of 2D-CNN models that attained average test accuracies ranging from 85.63% to 88.22% using 1, 10, or 100 radial sections extracted from the 3D OCT volumes. The 3D-CNN (~12 million parameters) was benchmarked against three state-of-the-art volumetric architectures: the 3D Vision Transformer (3D-ViT, ~45 million parameters), 3D-DenseNet121 (~12 million parameters), and the Multi-plane and Multi-slice Transformer (M3T, ~29 million parameters). While these models achieved comparable inferencing accuracy, the 3D-CNN exhibited lower inference latency (33 ms) than 3D-ViT (86 ms), 3D-DenseNet121 (58 ms), and M3T (93 ms), representing a critical advantage for real-time surgical guidance applications. These results demonstrate the 3D-CNN's capability as a powerful and practical tool for computer-aided diagnosis in OCT-guided surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.