SynthesisPsycho-oncology2025
Suicide and Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Narrative Synthesis.
Synthesis in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suicide and Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Narrative Synthesis.Psycho-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk Factors for Catastrophic Health Events in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review to Inform Risk Prediction.Cancers · 2026Review
- Global Qualitative Study of Professionals' Perspectives of Caring for People With Head and Neck Cancer Experiencing Suicidal Ideation.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Suicide mortality and suicidal ideation among patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePeople with head and neck cancer are up to three times more likely to die by suicide than the general population. There is an urgency to understand and address the growing rates of suicidality within this population. The objectives of this review are (1) to explore the risk factors for thoughts of suicide and self-harm, and suicide completion in patients with head and neck cancer, and (2) to understand the challenges and needs of patients impacted by head and neck cancer who have had thoughts of self-harm and suicide.
methodsMixed-methods systematic review following the PRISMA protocol. Electronic databases and grey literature searches were completed using MeSH terms and key word searches. A total of 3665 recorded were identified; with 36 studies included. Of these, 22 focussed on suicide completion, with sufficient data to conduct a meta-analysis on several important risk factors for suicide completion. These are sex, age, time since diagnosis and marital status. The remaining 14 studies reported on suicide ideation for this population, with the findings analysed within a narrative synthesis. Findings and clinical implications were refined with input from nine members of a head and neck cancer patient and public involvement group.
findingsRisk of suicide ideation and suicide completion was greatest in male patients. Suicide completion was highest in patients within the first 6-months of diagnosis, who were widowed, or had cancer of the hypopharynx. Suboptimal pain and symptom management appeared related to a higher risk of suicide ideation. A therapeutic and supportive relationship with health and social care professionals was helpful in managing experiences of suicidal ideation.
conclusionsHealth and social care professionals should identify, assess, support and follow-up regarding thoughts of suicide for patients with head and neck cancer. Clear pathways are necessary for the management of suicidality, to include appropriate referrals to psychiatry/psychology, supportive interventions to include medications that can help with pain, distress or other symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.