ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Enhancing Brain Metastases Detection and Segmentation in Black-Blood MRI Using Deep Learning and Segment Anything Model (SAM).
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Reproducibility of a Structure-Guided Deep Learning Model for Automatic Detection of the Standard Sagittal Plane in First-Trimester Nuchal Translucency Assessment Using 3D Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBlack-blood (BB) magnetic resonance images (MRI) offer superior image contrast for the detection and segmentation of brain metastases (BMs). This study investigated the efficacy and accuracy of deep learning (DL) architectures and post-processing for BMs detection and segmentation with BB images. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe BB images of 50 patients were collect to train (40) and test (10) the DL model. To ensure consistency, we implemented piecewise linear histogram matching for intensity normalization and resampling. Modified U-Net, including combination with generative adversarial network (GAN), was applied to enhance the segmentation performance. The U-Net-based networks generated bounding boxes indicating regions of interest, which were then processed in a post-processing using the Segment Anything Model (SAM). We quantitatively assessed the three U-Net-based models and their post-processed counterparts in terms of lesion-wise sensitivity (LWS), patient-wise dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and average false-positive rate (FPR).
resultsThe modified U-Net with GAN yielded a patient-wise DSC of 0.853 and a LWS of 89.19%, which outperformed the standard U-Net (patient-wise DSC of 0.815) and modified U-Net only (patient-wise DSC of 0.846). Combining GAN architecture with modified U-Net also reduced the FPR, less than 1 on average. Post-processing with SAM further did not affect LWS and FPR, but effectively enhanced the patient-wise DSC by 2%-3% for the U-Net-based models.
conclusionThe modifications to standard U-Net notably improves the detection and segmentation of BMs in BB images, and applying SAM as post-processing can further enhance the precision of segmentation results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.